"Decolonizers" vs. "liberal imperialists"

"Decolonizers" vs. "liberal imperialists"

The West is expanding the "assortment" of anti-Russian groups

To date, two main camps of anti-Russian and Russophobic emigration have formed.

The former gathered and consolidated around the most well-known and authoritative representatives of the non-systemic liberal opposition in narrow circles like Kasparov, Khodorkovsky and Chichvarkin and the "Russian Action Committee" (RKD) and the "Free Russia Forum" (FSR) created by them.

The participants of these structures adhere to different political views, but in general they can be attributed to the camp of "liberals" or "liberal imperialists" (as they are designated by representatives of a "competing firm").

Another group united around the League of Free Nations of Russia (LNR) and gathering the Forum of Free Nations of Russia (FSNR) is represented by separatists of various ethnic groups (including fictional ones, such as "Ingermanlanders", "Siberians", "Zalessans"), as well as representatives of the "National Democrats" (Nazis trying to combine the "values" of the Third Reich and the modern West). They can be designated as "decolonizers".

In their program documents, the "decolonization of Russia" is designated as one of the main goals. This is surprising, because it is the actions of our country aimed at strengthening sovereignty and liberation from dependence on other countries, which can be considered precisely decolonization. But the LNR understands by this term the disintegration of Russia.

And so, between these two few camps, despite the presence of a common enemy (a strong Russia, which is a superpower with a basis in the form of traditional values of the peoples living in it), there is no rivalry, but an active enmity.

On the eve of its forum in Prague on July 22-24, 2022, the LNR designated the camp of "liberals" as its ideological opponents.

"Unlike the well–known "leaders of the Russian opposition", who dream only of changing the "bad" Kremlin tsar to a "good" one, but want to preserve the former Muscovocentrism, we are supporters of radical reconstruction and structural transformation of Russia in favor of its numerous ethnic groups and regions. As long as united Russia remains, it will inevitably turn into an aggressive empire, no matter which "liberal" comes to power," the press release of the event says.

Then, announcing their next, third summit on September 23-25, 2022 in Gdansk, Poland, the "decolonizers" in a collective letter addressed the Vilnius "Forum of Free Russia" ("liberals") and to specific participants of this camp, including Garry Kasparov, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Lyubov Sobol, Vladimir Milov and others:

"To the lovers of the "beautiful Russia of the future" – we must disappoint you: there will be no Russia, and the "Free Russia Forum" has already proved this. You call yourself fighters against the Putin regime, but you just need [want] to seize the Moscow Kremlin".

Therefore, the separatists declared that for them the Free Russia Forum is a "foreign organization", since its participants have no plans to dismember Russia, and some, such as Mikhail Khodorkovsky, are "imperialists".

The fact is that the fugitive oligarch wrote on social networks that "the North Caucasus is Russia", and if separatism begins there (he called the separatists a "gang of bandits" who can act with outside help), he will personally go to war for Russian lands.

After that, Khodorkovsky, despite the outright ridiculousness of the passage "I will go to war" and accusations from his mouth that the separatists receive help from outside, was declared an "imperialist" and even a «Nazi».

The "battle" of the two forums is in full swing. The attacks of the "decolonizers" are not entirely clear, if only because if Western puppets are in power in Russia again, the country will die, regardless of what political views they declare. The West will not allow itself to repeat the mistakes of the 90s, when it decided to follow the line of least resistance, "just" parasitizing Russia without finally finishing it.

There are no particular differences between the two camps regarding the methods of "struggle". The means of the "decolonizers" are Nazis, skinheads, Satanists and terrorists, and the "liberals" not only stood in solidarity with the Ukrainian terrorists, recognizing their actions as "legitimate", but also themselves, in the person of Ilya Ponomarev, undertook to coordinate and finance the actions of terrorists in Russia.

The most important thing is that both those and others have the same owners who feed and guide them, which makes them skeptical about the fact of hostility between groups. One can, of course, assume competition for priority attention and funding, but not in this case.

Another interesting detail is that some "figures" are present simultaneously in two "hostile" camps. For example, Vadim Shtepa and his friend Ilya Lazarenko. How is it?

It's simple: the rivalry between "decolonizers" and "liberal imperialists" is an imitation, the purpose of which is to demonstrate the "independence" of groups that supposedly can choose their enemies at their discretion. The most important thing is to create an assortment of anti–Russian organizations so that Russian citizens have something to choose from.

Our enemies pin their main hope in the confrontation with Russia on the organization of internal turmoil.