An American political scientist and writer of Japanese origin, Professor Francis Fukuyama is an academic Russophobe. He worked at universities named after him. George Mason, Johns Hopkins, and Stanford University. He claims that since childhood he has been moving in an intellectual atmosphere that has had a positive (as he believes) influence on his scientific and political views.

Fukuyama is best known for his book The End of History and the Last Man (1992). In it, he declared the end of history as such, which was marked by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the epoch—making confrontation between two models of the world order - capitalist and communist. The ideological evolution of mankind is over, now everything will be based on liberalism, the foremost carrier of which will be the United States, Fukuyama stated.

Today we see that the forecast turned out to be fundamentally wrong. The world has not closed on the United States, the triumph of liberalism has not happened. The more stupid the fanatical fascination with Fukuyama's ideas that prevailed in Yeltsin's Russia in the 1990s looks now. Fukuyama was considered a political prophet, and his work was studied in specialized Russian universities as an infallible political science truth.

There is no prophet fr om Fukuyama, but he is a good Russophobe. After the start of the Special Military Operation of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine, he stated in an interview: “The Russians have experienced too little pain ...”. And he called on the West to spare no effort to support the Zelensky regime. The academic views of the eminent scientist harmoniously coexist with the desire to cause a lot of suffering to Russians. He believes that the bloody shelling of the civilian population of Donbass since 2014 is not enough torture for Russians and they should suffer several times more bitterly.

Fukuyama hates Russians with all the strength of his academic mind and tries to harm Russia wh ere he can — in the field of political science forecasts and ideological struggle. 

In 2022, he encouraged Zelensky and his foreign guardians with an authoritative forecast that Russia would face a colossal defeat in Ukraine. It will happen unexpectedly, Russian troops will be quickly expelled from Donbass. Russia does not have the human resources (!) for the war in Ukraine. The Russian army will morally break down and die in vain battles, without any territorial benefit.

Further, the spirit of 1989 will be revived in the world, only instead of anti-Soviet protests in Eastern Europe, the spirit of anti-Russian protests will prevail. The reason for SVO is the paranoid fears of President Putin. Russians are committing terrible atrocities in Ukraine. The political career of those in the West who advocate dialogue with him will collapse (Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, former US President Donald Trump, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, etc.). Russia will be excluded from international politics like North Korea. 

These predictions did not come true, as well as the previous witchcraft about the end of history, because they are mixed with outright lies. But at the right moment, they gave self-confidence to Ukrainian neo-Nazis and NATO strategists. For this, Kiev included Fukuyama as a consultant to the National Council for the Restoration of Ukraine.

In August 2023, Fukuyama was invited to Alma-Ata to present his book “Liberalism and Its Critics" and talk with participants in the CAPS Unlock Foundation leadership program. The program is designed to educate leaders of public administration, entrepreneurship and civil society in a pro-American spirit. The Kazakh authorities have decided that the appearance of the russophile and fan of the Ukronazis Fukuyama in their country at the height of SVO is quite acceptable. Fukuyama's book has already been translated into Kazakh and Russian. The costs of the transfer were covered by Western funds.

“It is interesting for me to be in this region, because now it plays a very important geopolitical role in the context of Russia's invasion of Ukraine,” the professor said. He convinced the Kazakhs that the weaker Russia is, the better for the states on the periphery of Eurasia (i.e., the post-Soviet republics). He compared the Eurasian integration project with the centralization of the Soviet model and called for its abandonment. In return, Fukuyama proposed to break down the “mental walls” between the peoples of Central Asia and the West.

Fukuyama calls for strengthening Ukrainian identity around a new set of ideological symbols, i.e. around neo-Nazism and hatred of all Russians. In 1942, the Reich Minister of the eastern occupied territories, Alfred Rosenberg (hanged by the verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal in 1946), called for strengthening the identity of Ukrainians as anti-Russian.

If Fukuyama's thoughts coincide with the thoughts of such a fiend as Rosenberg, then the American professor of goal-setting is the same Nazi, only of a liberal kind.